IPR call reminder:
|
I draw your attention to your obligations under the 3GPP Partner Organizations’ IPR policies. Every Individual Member organization is obliged to declare to the Partner Organization or Organizations of which it is a member any IPR owned by the Individual Member or any other organization which is or is likely to become essential to the work of 3GPP. Delegates are asked to take note that they are thereby invited:
|
Antitrust policy Reminder:
|
I also draw your attention to the fact that 3GPP activities are subject to all applicable antitrust and competition laws and that compliance with said laws is therefore required of any participant of this TSG/WG/SWG meeting including the Chair and Vice Chairs. In case of question I recommend that you contact your legal counsel. The leadership shall conduct the present meeting with impartiality and in the interests of 3GPP. Furthermore, I would like to remind you that timely submission of work items in advance of TSG/WG/SWG meetings is important to allow for full and fair consideration of such matters. |
| AI | TD# | Type | Doc For | Subject | Source | Rel | Comments | e-mail_Discussion | Result |
| 4.1 | S2-2407399 | LS In | Information | LS from GSMA OPG: LS on clarifications on consent management | GSMA OPG (OPG_173_Doc_04) | Revision of postponed S2-2405883 from S2#163. Response drafted in S2-2408478. For e-mail approval | REPLY OPEN | ||
| 4.1 | S2-2409545 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on clarifications on consent management | Samsung | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2408687. For e-mail approval | Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r01. Magnus O (Ericsson) provides r02. Xiaoyan (CATT) provides comments to r02 & r03. Hyesung (Samsung) provides r03. Fenqin (Huawei) provides comments. Xiaoyan (CATT) replies to Fenqin (Huawei). Laurent (Nokia): provides r04 Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r05 Magnus O (Ericsson) providers r06 Hyesung (Samsung) provides r07. Xiaoyan (CATT): Fine with r07. Object to r06. Laurent (Nokia): Comments: R07 is the way to go. R06 lacks enough information ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Hyesung (Samsung) suggests to go with r07. | For email approval |
| 9.23.2 | S2-2407390 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG3: LS on Issues related Analytics context transfer between AnLF(s) | SA WG3 (S3-240912) | Rel-18 | The proposed response LSs and CRs were reviewed. Revision of postponed S2-2405849 from S2#163. Responses drafted in S2-2407489, S2-2407518, S2-2407546, S2-2408128. For e-mail approval | REPLY OPEN | |
| 9.23.2 | S2-2409524 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on Issues related to Analytics context transfer between AnLF(s) | Ericsson | Rel-18 | Revision of S2-2409255. For e-mail approval | Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r01. Leo (Deutsche Telekom) provides r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Xiaoyan (CATT) prefers r01. Belen (Ericcson) prefers r02 but if needed we can leave with r01 aiming to reach conclusions on this topic. Leo (Deutsche Telekom) prefers r02 but can live with r01. | For email approval |
| 19.1.2 | S2-2407449 | LS In | Action | LS from SA WG3-LI: Reply LS on FS_5GSAT_Ph3_ARCH conclusions | SA WG3-LI (S3i240477) | Rel-19 | Response drafted in S2-2408075. For e-mail approval | REPLY OPEN | |
| 19.1.2 | S2-2409410 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] Reply LS on UE-Satellite-UE communications | vivo | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2409115. For e-mail approval | Leo (Deutsche Telekom) provides r01. Amy (vivo) thanks Leo (Deutsche Telekom)'s r01 and is ok with r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 19.3.1 | S2-2409549 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on XRM metadata exchange between 3GPP Core and an Application server | Nokia | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2409423. For e-mail approval | Paul (Ericsson) provides r01. Xinpeng(Huawei) provides r02. Laurent (Nokia): provides r03 Laurent (Nokia): Comments (concerns with R01/R02) Paul (Ericsson) provides r04 adding further clarifications (all shaded yellow). Laurent (Nokia): provides r05 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Laurent (Nokia): objects to r01, r02 Paul (Ericsson) we are ok with r01, r04 and can live with r05. We object to all other revisions. | For email approval |
| 19.3.2 | S2-2407407 | LS In | Action | LS from RAN WG2: LS on multi-modality awareness at RAN | RAN WG2 (R2-2405782) | Rel-19 | Revision of postponed S2-2406853 from S2#163. Responses drafted in S2-2407506, S2-2407613, S2-2407789, S2-2408065, S2-2408085, S2-2408095, S2-2408420. For e-mail approval | REPLY OPEN | |
| 19.3.2 | S2-2409169 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS reply on multi-modality awareness at RAN | Huawei, Hisilicon, Meta USA, China Mobile, CATT, ZTE | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2408818. For e-mail approval | Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) provides comment on original version and requests a small editorial update. Sebastian (Qualcomm) comments and provides r01 Youngkyo(Samsung) comments. Youngkyo(Samsung) replies. Zhuoyun Zhang (vivo) provides r02. Hui(Huawei) asks for clarification. Georgios Gkellas (Nokia) does not accept r02. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) objects to r02 Hongsuk (LGE) comments and provides r03. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) objects to r03. Dan (China Mobile) provide r04 based on r01 with only update the date of next meeting. Georgios Gkellas (Nokia) objects to r03. Paul (Ericsson) objects to r02, r03 and provides r05. Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r06 Paul (Ericsson) supports r06. Hui (Huawei) provides r07 Jinhua (Xiaomi) supports r07. Georgios Gkellas (Nokia) provides r08. Paul (Ericsson) prefers r06, can live with r05 and objects to all other revisions, i.e., 00, 01,02, 03, 04, 07 and 08. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) is ok with r06. We object to r02, r03 and original version. Hui (Huawei) can live with r06. Georgios Gkellas (Nokia) is OK with r06, objects r02, r03. Jinhua (Xiaomi) prefer r07/r08, OK with r06. Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok with r06, objects to other versions | For email approval |
| 19.4.1 | S2-2409337 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS reply on RP-240825 per UE energy consumption in RAN | China Mobile | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2409298. For e-mail approval | Haris (Qualcomm) provides r01. Tao (CMCC) provides r02, refer to the Conclusion Section of the TR Haris (Qualcomm) comments on r02. Nokia(alessio) provides r05 and comments Tao(CMCC) response and can only accept the r0 and r02 Magnus O (Ericsson) comments that it makes sense to mention the WA in the LS. Marco (Huawei) comments, provides r06 and object to version r01, r03, r04 and r05. Alessio( Nokia) replies to Marco (Huawei) and cannot accept R06, provides r07 Chris (Vodafone) provides r08 to simplify and correct. LaeYoung (LGE) provides r09. Jungshin (Samsung) provides r10. Haris(Qualcomm) comments on r10. Alessio(Nokia) asks questions on R10 and proposes to note the Ls if the rapporteur believes there is no consensus (or there is confusions) on what SA2 could need from RAN. Jungshin (Samsung) provides response to Haris (Qualcomm). Alessio(Nokia) cannot accept r10. May be ok with r9, r8 if the view is cell level is required or nothing. Of course OK with r05, r07. Haris (Qualcomm) proposes r11. R10 is not acceptable Marco (Huawei) comments on per gNb/Cell Magnus O (Ericsson) Provides r12 implementing replacing 'at' with 'related to the' according to previous comment. LaeYoung (LGE) provides r13. Alessio(Nokia) OK with r12 Alessio(Nokia) has concerns with r13 as it is less precise on what the status in SA2 is and also on requirements on granularity. Most likely gNB level granularity would result on similar accuracy as the averages we have from estimates based on OAM+ data volume. There is no need to quote an EN either as this was there when we sent the first LS ??. Zhuoyun Zhang (vivo) prefers r13. Chris (Vodafone) provides r14 to avoid overstating the time sync issue. LaeYoung (LGE) replies to Alessio. LiMeng (Huawei) provides r15. zhendong (ZTE) provides r16. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Alessio(nokia) provides R-17 that places the discussion on editor's notes (including the notes in the WID) below the WA table and importantly asks about renewable energy aspect as it is required to know whether and if so in which amount it is used (as we need to expose it). also removes e.g. from cell and gNB level as not sure there is any other option? Xiaoyan (CATT): Fine with r13-r16, and cannot accept r12, r11, r09-r03 LaeYoung (LGE) proposes to go with r16 and also fine with r13 to r15. Zhuoyun Zhang (vivo) prefers r13-r16 with capturing the EN related with RAN WGs. Alessio(nokia) I would be happy to send something like in R17 (attempting to send something with reasonable structure at least) but if that is past deadline and as such not acceptable (sorry I had troubles to meet deadline for reasons outside my control), then we can only accept r12. The editor's note was already there when we sent the first LS so that is not the reason to send LS again. Jungshin (Samsung): TSG-RAN already provided the reply in RP-240825 for the question we are sending in this LS. We cannot accept any other revision than r10. Marco (Huawei): we accept r00/r06/r15/r16 and object any other versions. Tao (CMCC): we accept r00/r02/r13 and object any other versions. | For email approval |
| 30.1 | S2-2409267 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on User Identities and Authentication Architecture | InterDigital Inc. | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2408599. For e-mail approval. WITHDRAWN | Mike (InterDigital) asks that this paper be withdrawn. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 30.1 | S2-2408685 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on Integration of satellite components in the 5G architecture Phase 3 | CATT, Sateliot | Rel-19 | LATE DOC: Rx 16/08, 10:30 For e-mail approval | . ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 30.1 | S2-2407656 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on Enhancement of support for Edge Computing in 5G Core network - Phase 3 | Intel (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | No revision marks! For e-mail approval | Changhong (Intel) asks to mark it as withdrawn. Jinguo(ZTE) comments that the justification needs to remove the KI#3. Hyesung (Samsung) agrees with Jinguo that KI#3 aspect needs to be deleted from the justification section. Changhong (Intel) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 30.1 | S2-2407944 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on System architecture for Next Generation Real time Communication services Phase 2 | China Mobile | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | Rainer (Nokia) comments on NG_RTC_Ph2 WID. Yi (China Mobile) provides r01. Mu (Huawei) comments on WT-5 Yi (China Mobile) provides r02 (wrong version) and r03. Please take r03 for further comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Ashok (Samsung) comments Yi (China Mobile) replies to Kenny and propose to keep this sentence. Yi (China Mobile) propose to agree r03. can live with r03+removing 'reporting to PS Data Off status change from IMS AS to DCSF' Rainer (Nokia) replies Zhenhua (vivo) agree with CMCC to keep 'reporting PS Data off status change from IMS AS to DCSF' Hao (ZTE) comments. Mu (Huawei) prefer to keep the sentence. The agreed part is the PS core will follow 501, but IMS will have the ability to manage per-application management Ashok (Samsung) provides response. Mu (Huawei) replies Mu (Huawei) only accepts r03. Zhenhua (vivo) only accepts r03 too. Yi (China Mobile) propose to move forward by agree r03 from this meeting and discuss it before next SA2 meeting and submit contributions to align WID and TR conclusion. | For email approval |
| 30.1 | S2-2408024 | WID REVISED | Approval | [Revised] WID on 5GS XRM Ph2 | Nokia, Meta | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | Devaki (Nokia) provides r01. Devaki (Nokia) provides r02 Devaki (Nokia) provides r03 Devaki (Nokia) provides r04. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) comments on all revisions so far until r04. Sebastian (Qualcomm) replies to Mehrdad Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) replies to Qualcomm Devaki (Nokia) comments. Youngkyo(Samsung) shares the view from Mehrdad (MediaTek). Dan (China Mobile) suggest to keep the FEC bullet and adding a note which alignment with the TR conclusion Lei (Tencent) supports China Mobile, Qualcomm and rapporteur's opinion to keep the FEC bullet and adding a note which aligns with the TR conclusion Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) provides r05 and objects to rest of revisions and original version. Devaki (Nokia) proposes to go with r05 and thanks Mehrdad (MediaTek) for the constructive revision proposal. Curt (Meta) agrees with Devaki (Nokia). Devaki (Nokia) provides r06 (with just editorial fixes). Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r07; (r06 was already available, not sure who provided it?) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) is OK with r05, r06, r07 and objects to rest of revisions and original version. Paul (Ericsson) we prefer r06 but can also live with r07. We object to all other revisions. Jinhua (Xiaomi) Provides r08 based on r07, replaced WT#2 with WT#2.1 Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok with r07; also ok with r07 + replacing WT#2 by WT#2.1 as proposed by Jinhua; not ok with other revisions | For email approval |
| 30.1 | S2-2408028 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on Phase 3 for UAS, UAV and UAM | LG Electronics, Ericsson | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | LaeYoung (LGE) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 30.1 | S2-2408135 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on Multi-Access (DualSteer and ATSSS_Ph4) | Apple (Primary Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | Revision of SP-240994. For e-mail approval | Pallab (Nokia) proposes that the WID update is not needed considering the outcome of the study Florin (CableLabs) agrees with Pallab's comment. The proposed WID update should be NOTED based on the discussions and conclusions from the last couple of meetings. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) agrees with Nokia and CableLabs that the Revised WID can be NOTED. Yildirim (Charter Communications) agrees with Nokia, CableLabs and MediaTek that the revised WID should be NOTED based on the outcome at last meeting. Krisztian (Apple) proposes to NOTE this document. Dieter(Deutsche Telekom) also proposes to NOTE this document. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 30.1 | S2-2409197 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised SID on FS_MASSS | Apple (Primary Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | Pallab (Nokia) proposes that the SID update is not needed considering the outcome of the study Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc) agrees with Nokia that the SID update can be noted Yildirim (Charter Communications) agrees with Nokia, NEC and MediaTek that the SID update can be NOTED based on the outcome of last meeting. Krisztian (Apple) proposes to NOTE this document. Dieter(Deutsche Telekom) also proposes to NOTE this document. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Florin (CableLabs) supports the proposal from the rapporteur and Dieter (DT) to NOTE this document. | For email approval |
| 30.1 | S2-2409560 | WID REVISED | Approval | Revised WID on 5G_ProSe_Ph3 | KPN N.V. | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | Nassima (KPN N.V.) provides r00 Nassima (KPN N.V.) provides r01 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 30.3 | S2-2407657 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-49 to TSG SA#104 | Intel (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | . ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 30.3 | S2-2409561 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-59 to TSG SA for approval | Ericsson Inc., LG Electronics | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2408027. For e-mail approval | Shabnam (Ericsson) provides revision of 8027 in 9561 Runze (Huawei) provides r01. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 30.3 | S2-2408144 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-13 to TSG SA for Information | OPPO, Huawei | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments Fei (OPPO) replied to Peter (Ericsson) and provided r01 Sebastian (Qualcomm) comments and provides r02 Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides r03 Runze (Huawei) replies to Peter Hedman (Ericsson). Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides reply to Runze (Huawei) Runze (Huawei) replies to Peter Hedman (Ericsson) and provides r04. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc) wonders why the bullet on evaluation and conclusion removed from r04. Runze (Huawei) replies to Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc) and provides r05. Peter Hedman (Ericsson) provides comments and proposal for removing a word Sebastian (Qualcomm) comments and provides r06 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Runze (Huawei) supports r00, r05 or r06, and objects to other revisions. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc) prefers r06 and objects to the rest of revisions and original version. Fei (OPPO) is also fine with r06 and indicates that the first 'continue' should be removed in the second bullet. Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok with r06 and objects to other versions | For email approval |
| 30.3 | S2-2408145 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-54 to TSG SA for approval | Apple, China Telecom (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | LaeYoung (LGE) is wondering about way forward or decision on this TR cover sheet. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc) suggests to either revise this cover sheet to capture the latest outcome from Friday or to note. Yildirim (Charter Communications) agree with the suggestion from MediaTek. Krisztian (Apple) provides r01. Pallab (Nokia) comments and provides r02. Not OK with r01 Stefano (Qualcomm) comments and provides r03. Not OK with r01 and r02. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Patrice (Huawei) agrees to approve r02, objects r01 and r03. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc) suggests to approve r02. We object to r01, r03 and original version. | For email approval |
| 30.3 | S2-2408295 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-03 to TSG SA for approval | KPN N.V., AT&T (Rapporteurs) | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | Nassima (KPN N.V.) cover sheet available for comments Fei (OPPO) comments and provides r01. Nassima (KPN N.V.) comments and provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 30.3 | S2-2408324 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-84 to TSG SA for Approval | MediaTek Inc. (Rapporteur), vivo (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) provides r01. Belen (Ericsson) objects to initial version and r01, provides r02. Mehrdad (MediaTek) clarifies to Ericsson that we already have been 95% in last plenary. You can not change that to 85% Belen (Ericsson) is okay to go for r02 then change completion rate to 95% Mehrdad (MediaTek) provides r03 Xiaoyan (CATT) provides comments on r02 and provides r04. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) replies to CATT and clarifies that all of this has already presented to plenary in last cycle for information. The check point is September. We can not remove anything. Thomas(Nokia) provides r05 and comments that the decision whether to update the SID scope based on RAN feedback is up to SA plenary. TR approval should only happen if the SID scope is not updated Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc) is OK with r05. It covers well all eventualities. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 30.3 | S2-2408385 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-66 to TSG SA for approval | Samsung, Lenovo | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | Haris (Qualcomm) provides r01 Alessio (Nokia) provides r02 ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Jungshin (Samsung) is ok with r02 | For email approval |
| 30.3 | S2-2409266 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-32 to TSG SA#105 for approval | InterDigital, Europe, Ltd. | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2408603. For e-mail approval. WITHDRAWN | Mike (InterDigital) asks that this paper be withdrawn. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | Withdrawn |
| 30.3 | S2-2409265 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-70 to TSG SA for approval | Meta USA, Nokia (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | Created at meeting. For e-mail approval | . ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |
| 30.3 | S2-2409437 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for Study on System aspects of 5G NR Femto (FS_5G_Femto) for TSG SA approval | DOCOMO (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | For e-mail approval | Malla (NTT DOCOMO): cover sheet is available for your comments. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== | For email approval |