IPR call reminder:
|
I draw your attention to your obligations under the 3GPP Partner Organizations’ IPR policies. Every Individual Member organization is obliged to declare to the Partner Organization or Organizations of which it is a member any IPR owned by the Individual Member or any other organization which is or is likely to become essential to the work of 3GPP. Delegates are asked to take note that they are thereby invited:
|
Antitrust policy Reminder:
|
I also draw your attention to the fact that 3GPP activities are subject to all applicable antitrust and competition laws and that compliance with said laws is therefore required of any participant of this TSG/WG/SWG meeting including the Chair and Vice Chairs. In case of question I recommend that you contact your legal counsel. The leadership shall conduct the present meeting with impartiality and in the interests of 3GPP. Furthermore, I would like to remind you that timely submission of work items in advance of TSG/WG/SWG meetings is important to allow for full and fair consideration of such matters. |
| AI | TD# | Type | Doc For | Subject | Source | Rel | Comments | e-mail_Discussion | Result |
| 19.4.2 | S2-2413029 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on energy saving indication from CN to RAN | SA WG2 | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2413018. For e-mail approval. r00 agreed. Revised to S2-2413034. | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Comments Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 19.4.2 | S2-2413034 | LS OUT | Approval | LS on energy saving indication from CN to RAN | SA WG2 | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2413029r00. This LS OUT was approved | Approved | |
| 19.14.1 | S2-2413028 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on A-IoT Conclusions in SA WG2 | SA WG2 | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2412807. For e-mail approval. r05 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2413035. | Runze (Huawei) provides r01. Dongjoo (Nokia) provides r02. Shabnam (Ericsson) provides r03, changes highlighted in Green Runze (Huawei) replies to Shabnam (Ericsson). Runze (Huawei) replies to Dongjoo (Nokia). Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r04 Shabnam (Ericsson) provides r05, changes highlighted in Green Shabnam (Ericsson) provides r06, updates the grey texts in r05. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dongjoo (Nokia) provides a response to Runze (Huawei). Dongjoo (Nokia) replies to Runze (Huawei). Runze (Huawei) replies to Guanzhou (InterDigital). Guanzhou (InterDigital) asks about the version number of the new TR. Dongjoo (Nokia) provides feedback to Runze (Huawei). Dongjoo (Nokia) prefers r05, but can live with r06 if the text in grey is reworded as 'Note that whether to continue with all the architecture options listed in the TR conclusion is to be determined at SA#106'. This is to clarify the r06 is provided by Runze (Huawei). Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok with r04 or r05 if 'are' is replaced by 'or' in 'Note that whether to continue with all the down-selected options are not, is to be determined.'. Sebastian (Qualcomm) objects to all other versions Ericsson (Shabnam) prefers r05 with 'are' is replaced by 'or' in 'Note that whether to continue with all the down-selected options are or not, is to be determined.' , or replace the Note with ': 'Note that whether to continue with all the architecture options listed in the TR conclusion is to be determined', objects to all other versions Runze (Huawei) suggests to go with r05 + replace the Note with ': 'Note that whether to continue with all the architecture options listed in the TR conclusion is to be determined', objects to all other versions + update TR number to 1.2.0 Dongjoo (Nokia) confirms Nokia is fine with the proposal from Runze (Huawei). Guanzhou (InterDigital) is fine with the proposal from Runze (Huawei). Sang-Jun (Samsung) is fine with the proposal from Runze (Huawei). ==== Final Comments Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 19.14.1 | S2-2413035 | LS OUT | Approval | [DRAFT] LS on A-IoT Conclusions in SA WG2 | SA WG2 | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2413028r05 + changes. This LS OUT was approved | Approved | |
| 30.3 | S2-2413017 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-13 to TSG SA for Information | OPPO | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2413014. For e-mail approval. r08 agreed. Revised to S2-2413036. | Dongjoo (Nokia) provides comments and r01. Guanzhou (InterDigital) comments on r01. Dongjoo (Nokia) responses to Guanzhou (InterDigital). Runze (Huawei) replies to Dongjoo (Nokia) and comments on r01. Lars (Sony) comments on r01. Fei (OPPO) comments and provides r02 Dongjoo (Nokia) responses to Runze (Huawei) and Lars (Sony), and provides r02 <https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_sa/WG2_Arch/TSGS2_166_Orlando_2024-11/INBOX/e-mail_Approval/Revisions/S2-2413017r02.zip> . Lars (Sony) responds to Dongjoo (Nokia) Dongjoo (Nokia) provides r03 <https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_sa/WG2_Arch/TSGS2_166_Orlando_2024-11/INBOX/e-mail_Approval/Revisions/S2-2413017r03.zip> . Runze (Huawei) provides r04, on top of r02, and replies to Dongjoo (Nokia). Dongjoo (Nokia) provides responses to Runze (Huawei) and r05 <https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_sa/WG2_Arch/TSGS2_166_Orlando_2024-11/INBOX/e-mail_Approval/Revisions/S2-2413017r05.zip> . Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r06 Shabnam (Ericsson) provides r07, changes highlighted in Green Sebastian (Qualcomm) provides r08 Runze (Huawei) comments on r05 to r08. Strong concern if the criterion to add bullets is for which aspects companies have different views. It is not acceptable to pick issues from companies interest. We should focus on the ENs only. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Dongjoo (Nokia) provides responses to Runze (Huawei) and supports only from r05 to r08. Sebastian (Qualcomm) is ok with r08 and r06, objects to other versions Lars (Sony) prefer r07 but can accept r08 or r06 also. Runze (Huawei) does not believe r05 - r08 properly reflect the TR situation, but can compromise with r06 or r08. Shabnam (Ericsson) prefer r07 but can also accept r08. Objects to all other versions. Dongjoo (Nokia) is ok with r08. Sang-Jun (Samsung) is OK with r08. ==== Final Comments Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 30.3 | S2-2413036 | TS OR TR COVER | Approval | Cover sheet for presentation of TR 23.700-13 to TSG SA for Information | OPPO | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2413017r08. This TS OR TR COVER was approved | Approved | |
| 30.9 | S2-2413004 | WI EXCEPTION REQUEST | Agreement | Rel-19 Work Item Exception for AIML_CN | vivo (Rapporteur), MediaTek Inc. (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2412998. For e-mail approval. r07 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2413037. | Xiaobo (vivo) provides r01 to address the comments from David(apple) Leo (Deutsche Telekom) provides comments on r01 Xiaobo (vivo) provides r02 to add some open issues in KI#1. Zhang (Huawei) provides r03 and provide comments Xiaobo (vivo) provides r04 to address the received comments (new changes highlighted in yellow) Dario (SA2 VC) provides comments. Bahador (NTT DOCOMO) clarifies the EN on Roaming in KI#4 and requests to remove it Belen (Ericsson) objects to r04, is okay with r03. Haiyang (Huawei) provides comments/questions David (Apple) provides r05 Haiyang (Huawei) replies to David (Apple) Xiaobo (vivo) provides r06 to address the received comments (new changes highlighted in yellow) Xiaobo (vivo) provides r07 to include 23.273 and 23.503 as impacted TSs. To complete the list of issues including impact on other TSs that have not been discussed due to lack if time. Belen (Ericsson) (corrected company/name) provides r07 to include 23.273 and 23.503 as impacted TSs. To complete the list of issues including impact on other TSs that have not been discussed due to lack if time. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Belen (Ericsson) prefers to agree r07, objects to r04, r05, can live with r06, r03, r02. Zhang (Huawei) is OK with r07. Michael (Deutsche Telekom) is OK with r07. Xiaoyan (CATT) can live with r07. Thomas (Nokia) can live with r07. Thomas (Nokia) corrects himself: objects against r06 and r07. Suggest agreeing r05 Belen (Ericsson) re-states objections to r05. Suggests to agree on r07 adding EN on RAN load that Nokia proposes. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) suggests to also agree on r07 + adding EN on RAN load as requested. Thomas(Nokia) would be fine to agree on r07 plus removed bullet on RAN load. ==== Final Comments Deadline ==== Xiaobo (vivo) provide r07 + added back the bullet on RAN load for KI#1 ' Whether LMF can take NG-RAN load into account when performing data collection' . | Revised |
| 30.9 | S2-2413037 | WI EXCEPTION REQUEST | Agreement | Rel-19 Work Item Exception for AIML_CN | vivo (Rapporteur), MediaTek Inc. (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2413004r07 + changes. This WI EXCEPTION REQUEST was approved | Approved | |
| 30.9 | S2-2412999 | WI EXCEPTION REQUEST | Approval | Rel-19 Work Item Exception for XRM_Ph2 | Nokia (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2412862. For e-mail approval. r09 + changes agreed. Revised to S2-2413038. | Paul (Ericsson) provides comments and r01. Curt (Meta) provides r02. Georgios (Nokia) provides r03. Lei (Tencent) provides r04. Paul (Ericsson) provides r05 and proposes to increase the amount of TUs. Mehrdad (Mediatek Inc.) provides r06. Georgios (Nokia) provides r07 with a better effort estimation as justified below. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Mehrdad (MeditaTek Inc.) objects to original version, r01,r02,r03,r04, r05, r07. We can only accept r06. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) objects to original version, r01,r02,r03,r04, r05, r07. We can only accept r06. Georgios replies to Mehrdad Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) replies to Nokia Paul (Ericsson) We can only accept r05, r06 and (late) r08 and object r00, r01, r02, r03, r04, r07. Paul (Ericsson) provides comments and r08. Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.): we are OK with (late) r08 proposed by Ericsson and also r06 but we object to rest of revisions. Georgios (Nokia): We believe the effort in r08 is bit higher than expected, we have done a detailed analysis. Could we have a short call to clarify? Georgios (Nokia): Provides late r09 which is accepted by Mediatek, Ericsson, Nokia Mehrdad (MediaTek Inc.) can live with late r09. Sebastian (Qualcomm) can only accept r09 if 'or a candidate for Rel-20' and 'or be a Rel-20 candidate' are removed (two occurrences) and if the TUs for 'Exposure of available data rate' are increased to 0.5; objects to other versions Georgios (Nokia) is OK with Qualcomm's changes to r09. I am not providing another revision as we have passed the deadline Georgios (Nokia) informs the team that input from RAN WGs on items 1,2 shall be available for the January meeting and can be leveraged ==== Final Comments Deadline ==== | Revised |
| 30.9 | S2-2413038 | WI EXCEPTION REQUEST | Approval | Rel-19 Work Item Exception for XRM_Ph2 | Nokia (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2412999r09 + changes. This WI EXCEPTION REQUEST was approved | Approved | |
| 30.9 | S2-2413000 | WI EXCEPTION REQUEST | Approval | Rel-19 Work Item Exception for 5GSAT_Ph3_ARCH | Sateliot (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2412863. For e-mail approval. Noted | Leo (Deutsche Telekom) provides comments on original version and requests an update of the document Haris (Qualcomm) provides r01 Kundan(NEC) seeks more clarification for rewording 2c and argues that 2b can be done as cat F CR. Saubhagya (Nokia) provides r02 Saubhagya (Nokia) provide comments Steve (Huawei) comments that WT1 is not in the WID, and WT2 might only need a note in an informative annex about an example deployment (if at all). Leo (Deutsche Telekom) has concerns regarding the statements 'The WT3 is stable' as all CRs on WT3 in SA2#166 and SA2#165 will be 'noted' Sushmit (NTT DOCOMO) provides comments and responds to Leo Huawei prefers to indicate that WT3 is stable despite the decision to change the status of the CRs discussed since the last SA plenary from agreed to noted. Ramon (Sateliot) responds to Steve(Huawei) on the use of 'WT1' to refer to the SA2 work for KI#1, Haris (Qualcomm) comments on WT1 and its presence in exception sheet Kundan (NEC) provides r03 including generic requirement to support ESM procedure for split MME case. Haris (Qualcomm) comments that r03 is not agreeable Steve (Huawei) comments on WT2 and (the mysterious) WT1 alignment with RAN. ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Boren (OPPO) comments on the bullet 2b of WT2 Wen (vivo) comments on WT2 Kundan(NEC) responds to Haris. The added exception is for split MME architecture, I forgot to capture explicitly but it is well understood. Steve (Huawei) is ok with r02. r03 is not acceptable, r0..r1 too old. It is fine to keep or remove 2b and 2c from r02 if there is no consensus on those bullets. Leo (Deutsche Telekom) is ok with r02. Hucheng(CATT) also thinks WT#3 is quite stable, and proposes to go with r00 or r02 Haris (Qualcomm) prefers r02. Can also accept r01. Objects to r0 and r03 Thierry (Novamint) is ok with r02. (Not OK with r03) Ramon (Sateliot) is ok with r02 and provides some further comments on point 2b. Kundan(NEC) is fine with r03 only. Objects r00-r02. r02 is acceptable only after 1. deleting following line: 'no normavtive impacts are expected' from two places * If (2c) is not addressed, the specification will remain unclear/ambiguous. No normative impacts are expected * The specification will remain unclear/ambiguous. No normative impacts are expected. 2 ) removing 'Document in Informative annex for split-MME deployment' from following bullet. * (2c) - Document in Informative annex for split-MME deployment that; support of Attach with PDN connection is handled based on implementation between the MME on board and ground CN entities. ==== Final Comments Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 30.9 | S2-2413001 | WI EXCEPTION REQUEST | Approval | Rel-19 Work Item Exception for UIA_ARC | Interdigital (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2412864. For e-mail approval. Noted | Mike (InterDigital) provides r01 to fix a typo Kenny (Qualcomm) replies to Srinivas Garikipati (Nokia) comments regards to KI4. Srinivas Garikipati (Nokia) provides comments as feedback to Kenny in regards to KI3 and KI4. Mike (InterDigital) replies to Kenny (Qualcomm) Kenny (Qualcomm) provides comments against Issue #2, #3and #4. Srinivas Garikipati (Nokia) comments and clarifies to Kenny. Kenny (Qualcomm) provides r02 with removal of issue #2, 3 & 4. Mike (InterDigital) provides r03 which includes only issues #1 and #2. Srinivas Garikipati (Nokia) provides v04 and clarifies that #3 and #4 are key aspects for end to end functionality, while #1 and #2 are optional ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Naman (Samsung) can only accept R03 or R01. Srinivas Garikipati (Nokia) accepts R04, can also compromise for R01. Do not accept rest of the revisions / versions. Kenny (Qualcomm) can only accept R02, we object the original version and any other revisions. Naman Gupta (Samsung) have concerns with R02 and R04 Magnus H (Ericsson) objects to r04, prefers r01, can live with rest Srinivas Garikipati (Nokia) accepts R04, can also compromise for R01. Do not accept rest of the revisions / versions; i.e we object to rest of the revisions. Jianning (Xiaomi) accepts R04, can live with R02, but Not accept R03. we have to drop some issues which cannot be changed even with exception time. Kenny (Qualcomm) proposes to agree R02, which is the maximum set of issues we can accept without objection, i.e., there is no objection on issue#1 based on the collected comments. Mike (InterDigital) is ok with r01, r02, and r03. Objects to r04. Proposes to agree r03. r03 proposes an extension only for issues #1 and #2; both issues are specifically mentioned on the WID. Pavan (Google) can live with r02 or r03. Concurs with Mike (InterDigital) that r03 reflects the WID best. Yildirim (Charter Communications) accepts r04 but can live with r01 to re-discuss all open items during 1Q25. Objects other revisions. Rahil (CableLabs) accepts r04, and can live with r01. Objects to other revisions. Naman (Samsung) can only accept R03 or R01. Objects to R00, R02 and R04 Iskren (NEC)) can only accept R01. Objects to all other revisions Zhendong (ZTE) can accept r04, and also can live with r01. ==== Final Comments Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 30.9 | S2-2413002 | WI EXCEPTION REQUEST | Approval | Rel-19 Work Item Exception for EnergySys | Samsung (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2412865. For e-mail approval. Noted | LiMeng (Huawei) provides comments and suggests to remove WT#2 and WT#3 in the exception sheet. Xiaoyan (CATT) provides r01. Alessio(Nokia) Comments and provides r04. Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides r03. LiMeng (Huawei) provides comments and considers r03 is a fair basis to be discussed further. Dan Wang(China Mobile) provides r02. Magnus O (Ericsson) Also considers r03 as a good way forward. Zhendong (ZTE) provides the comments. Alessio(Nokia) agrees with ZTE that we need to resolve the KI#2 editor's notes. And we need to also resolve the KI#3 NF selection (my understanding there is nothing normative yet ?) ==== Revisions Deadline ==== Alessio(nokia) provides comments and cannot accept r03, suggests to progress based on r04 LiMeng (Huawei) agrees with Juan (Qualcomm). Juan Zhang (Qualcomm) provides comments Jungshin (Samsung) also agrees to ZTE and Nokia. The unfinished task of the WT#2 should be in the Exception Sheet. Dan(China Mobile) object r03, and accept r00, r02, r04 zhendong (ZTE) can accept r00, r02. For r04, the 'Whether the Energy Saving indicator has multiple values' is quite unclear. Without ' multiple values' part, R04 is also acceptable Alessio(Nokia) can only accept r04 and replies to ZTE question by quoting an Editor's Note in agreed 23.501 CR S2-2413019 Magnus O (Ericsson) Prefers r03 and cannot accept r04 (at least in its current form). Object to other revisions. Xiaoyan(CATT) accepts r01, and objects to r00, r02, r03 and r04. Alessio(Nokia) detects that now we have no way forward unless a new modified r04 is proposed based on comments so that we have an exception sheet agreed, provides a modified r04 in EE folder in drafts to check Haris (Qualcomm) comments that agreeing post-deadline revisions is not possible due to timezone issues Alessio(Nokia) comments that exceptions sheets can be still discussed (actually SHALL be discussed) at SA level so companies can also comment there (this is not the last chance to discuss). Maybe a note can be added that the text needs to be validate at SA level (but unnecessary from my standpoint). That said we are happy with the original r04 of course ?? LiMeng (Huawei) can only accepts r03, objects to other versions including the original r00. ==== Final Comments Deadline ==== | Noted |
| 30.9 | S2-2413003 | WI EXCEPTION REQUEST | Approval | Rel-19 Work Item Exception for NG_RTC_Ph2 | China Mobile (Rapporteur) | Rel-19 | Revision of S2-2412866. For e-mail approval. This WI EXCEPTION REQUEST was approved | ==== Revisions Deadline ==== ==== Final Comments Deadline ==== | Approved |